Crying about the Dictionary isn't going to get things documented. Yeah,
it's documented in NuVoc.
Henry Rich
On 9/11/2014 3:13 PM, Jose Mario Quintana wrote:
My only guess is:
"m/y inserts successive verbs from the gerund m between items of y"
So, if there is no "between items of y" inserts nothing and y remains
unchanged; but, it seems to me that the Dictionary could be more assertive
in this instance.
On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Dan Bron <j...@bron.us> wrote:
Pepe wrote:
My only question is: Does the Dictionary support this behavior?
Raul responded:
Yes, it does.
I replied:
I am intrigued. Can you elaborate?
Thomas followed-up:
I assumed that by not mentioning it, the implementation
is free to do what it chooses. It could be anything!
That's what I think too. The behavior is, in the strictest literal sense,
undefined. But Raul differs. I'm interested in his rationale (which,
historically, has been both solid and instructive).
-Dan
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
