y always remains unchanged. Note also that the result is distinct from y: (-: +/) i.1 0
Thanks, -- Raul On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 3:13 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: > My only guess is: > "m/y inserts successive verbs from the gerund m between items of y" > > So, if there is no "between items of y" inserts nothing and y remains > unchanged; but, it seems to me that the Dictionary could be more assertive > in this instance. > > > On Thu, Sep 11, 2014 at 2:13 PM, Dan Bron <j...@bron.us> wrote: > >> Pepe wrote: >> > My only question is: Does the Dictionary support this behavior? >> >> > Raul responded: >> > Yes, it does. >> >> I replied: >> > I am intrigued. Can you elaborate? >> >> Thomas followed-up: >> > I assumed that by not mentioning it, the implementation >> > is free to do what it chooses. It could be anything! >> >> That's what I think too. The behavior is, in the strictest literal sense, >> undefined. But Raul differs. I'm interested in his rationale (which, >> historically, has been both solid and instructive). >> >> -Dan >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
