I expect to make some more improvements to dyad u"n, and eventually to rewrite the monad to match the dyad. My availability to work on this will be intermittent for a while. The 8.06 code as is works, and fixes a long-standing bug reported by Martin Neitzel.
I have suggested using m"n, where n is not _, to implement a cyclic gerund m. If m doesn't look like a gerund, it would be treated as a simple noun. While this is not strictly compatible, I think it very unlikely that it would break any existing code. I think m"n was wrongly defined and that this is the correct definition. My opinion is not universally shared so I haven't acted on it. Henry Rich On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Costigliola <fo...@iocane.net> wrote: > You can try removing the conditional statement enclosing that line, but > for now I would say the patch is broken under Clang. Since the rank code > was completely rewritten in J805 and J806 and ":: is based on the J804 rank > with some unfinished updates Henry was working on, the real solution is to > rewrite ":: based on the new rank code. But that should wait until the code > is stable. Does anyone anticipate more changes? > > On a more philosophical note, ":: implements gerund left arguments that > apply to the items cyclically. The reason for adding a new primitive and > not extending ": is because it breaks using ": to define constant > functions. If someone has any ideas to make them play nicely together then > they can be merged into a single primitive. The issue is that there is no > distinction between a noun and gerund. > > Regards, > -Thomas > > > On 08/02/2017 11:52 AM, bill lam wrote: > >> Yes, I use Clang and have -Werror -Wextra in CFLAGS. >> Sometimes vs2013 is much less tolerant. >> >> Ср, 02 авг 2017, Thomas Costigliola написал(а): >> >>> That looks like Henry's code taken from cr.c at some older version. It >>> compiles fine for me in GCC and Visual Studio 2013. It is in the >>> implementation of "::, which seems to be working in my tests, so that >>> code >>> never gets hit. Are you using Clang? It's much less tolerant of code like >>> that. >>> >>> Regards, >>> -Thomas >>> >>> On 08/02/2017 11:21 AM, bill lam wrote: >>> >>>> When I tried to compile, but this line in best.c failed. >>>> >>>> *((I*)0)=0; // scaf >>>> >>>> and I can not understand its intention, access to memory >>>> address 0 should cause segfault. >>>> >>>> Вт, 01 авг 2017, Jose Mario Quintana написал(а): >>>> >>>>> A brief description of the Jx v1.0 extensions, together with links to a >>>>> Windows 64 bit dll, a Unix 64 bit so binaries and the patch >>>>> corresponding >>>>> to the J806 source can be found at, >>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx1 >>>>> >>>>> Summary >>>>> >>>>> - Spelling >>>>> - Names with unicode characters >>>>> - Primitives >>>>> Added =.. =:: $:: [. ]. ]: ".. ":: `. ?: i.. O. >>>>> Extended ~ $. >>>>> - Foreign >>>>> Added 104!:5 Unnamed Execution >>>>> >>>>> - Trains >>>>> a v Added (different from Jx v0) >>>>> a a Extended (different from Jx v0) >>>>> c a Resurrected >>>>> a c a Resurrected >>>>> >>>>> The Jx v0 page, >>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx0 >>>>> will be removed in the near future >>>>> >>>>> Time permitting, there will be soon a script with assertions for those >>>>> who >>>>> want to verify binaries targeted for other platforms and I will try to >>>>> illustrate the facilities in action with some scripts. >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Jose Mario Quintana < >>>>> jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> The patches, a Windows 32-bit DLL, a cheatsheet, 32 and 64 bit Unix >>>>>> libraries are found at: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/ >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> For more details and demonstration code, see the article in the >>>>>> Journal of >>>>>> J: http://journalofj.com/index.php/vol-2-no-2-october-2013 (only the >>>>>> definition of the new conjunction knot (`.) has been slightly >>>>>> modified for >>>>>> the release). >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>> ---------- >>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>>> >>>> >>>> >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>> >> >> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
