"where n is not _"
That is a good idea. We tried trying to detect a gerund for any n but it
didn't make it past the standard library. Ignoring the gerund case for
rank _ might get further. I don't remember if I tested for stuff like
(<'const')"0. I will check that when I get a chance.
On 08/02/2017 03:36 PM, Henry Rich wrote:
I expect to make some more improvements to dyad u"n, and eventually to
rewrite the monad to match the dyad. My availability to work on this will
be intermittent for a while. The 8.06 code as is works, and fixes a
long-standing bug reported by Martin Neitzel.
I have suggested using m"n, where n is not _, to implement a cyclic gerund
m. If m doesn't look like a gerund, it would be treated as a simple noun.
While this is not strictly compatible, I think it very unlikely that it
would break any existing code. I think m"n was wrongly defined and that
this is the correct definition. My opinion is not universally shared so I
haven't acted on it.
Henry Rich
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Costigliola <fo...@iocane.net> wrote:
You can try removing the conditional statement enclosing that line, but
for now I would say the patch is broken under Clang. Since the rank code
was completely rewritten in J805 and J806 and ":: is based on the J804 rank
with some unfinished updates Henry was working on, the real solution is to
rewrite ":: based on the new rank code. But that should wait until the code
is stable. Does anyone anticipate more changes?
On a more philosophical note, ":: implements gerund left arguments that
apply to the items cyclically. The reason for adding a new primitive and
not extending ": is because it breaks using ": to define constant
functions. If someone has any ideas to make them play nicely together then
they can be merged into a single primitive. The issue is that there is no
distinction between a noun and gerund.
Regards,
-Thomas
On 08/02/2017 11:52 AM, bill lam wrote:
Yes, I use Clang and have -Werror -Wextra in CFLAGS.
Sometimes vs2013 is much less tolerant.
Ср, 02 авг 2017, Thomas Costigliola написал(а):
That looks like Henry's code taken from cr.c at some older version. It
compiles fine for me in GCC and Visual Studio 2013. It is in the
implementation of "::, which seems to be working in my tests, so that
code
never gets hit. Are you using Clang? It's much less tolerant of code like
that.
Regards,
-Thomas
On 08/02/2017 11:21 AM, bill lam wrote:
When I tried to compile, but this line in best.c failed.
*((I*)0)=0; // scaf
and I can not understand its intention, access to memory
address 0 should cause segfault.
Вт, 01 авг 2017, Jose Mario Quintana написал(а):
A brief description of the Jx v1.0 extensions, together with links to a
Windows 64 bit dll, a Unix 64 bit so binaries and the patch
corresponding
to the J806 source can be found at,
http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx1
Summary
- Spelling
- Names with unicode characters
- Primitives
Added =.. =:: $:: [. ]. ]: ".. ":: `. ?: i.. O.
Extended ~ $.
- Foreign
Added 104!:5 Unnamed Execution
- Trains
a v Added (different from Jx v0)
a a Extended (different from Jx v0)
c a Resurrected
a c a Resurrected
The Jx v0 page,
http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx0
will be removed in the near future
Time permitting, there will be soon a script with assertions for those
who
want to verify binaries targeted for other platforms and I will try to
illustrate the facilities in action with some scripts.
On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <
jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
The patches, a Windows 32-bit DLL, a cheatsheet, 32 and 64 bit Unix
libraries are found at:
http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/
For more details and demonstration code, see the article in the
Journal of
J: http://journalofj.com/index.php/vol-2-no-2-october-2013 (only the
definition of the new conjunction knot (`.) has been slightly
modified for
the release).
------------------------------------------------------------
----------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
