A noun need not be a gerund. Sent from my iPhone
On 3 Aug, 2017, at 9:19 AM, Don Guinn <dongu...@gmail.com> wrote: > A gerund is a noun. > > g=:+`- > g-:;:'+-' > 1 > > I don't know if others have taken advantage of building gerunds as boxed > lists, but I have. Can gerunds have rank greater than 1? So far I haven't > found a use for that, but who knows? > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 7:01 PM, Bill <bbill....@gmail.com> wrote: > >> J interpreter must know when a noun is a gerund, so is it possible to add >> a new primitive to test for gerund? Or is there already J script to test >> for gerund? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 3 Aug, 2017, at 3:36 AM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>> I expect to make some more improvements to dyad u"n, and eventually to >>> rewrite the monad to match the dyad. My availability to work on this >> will >>> be intermittent for a while. The 8.06 code as is works, and fixes a >>> long-standing bug reported by Martin Neitzel. >>> >>> I have suggested using m"n, where n is not _, to implement a cyclic >> gerund >>> m. If m doesn't look like a gerund, it would be treated as a simple >> noun. >>> While this is not strictly compatible, I think it very unlikely that it >>> would break any existing code. I think m"n was wrongly defined and that >>> this is the correct definition. My opinion is not universally shared so >> I >>> haven't acted on it. >>> >>> Henry Rich >>> >>> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Costigliola <fo...@iocane.net> >> wrote: >>> >>>> You can try removing the conditional statement enclosing that line, but >>>> for now I would say the patch is broken under Clang. Since the rank code >>>> was completely rewritten in J805 and J806 and ":: is based on the J804 >> rank >>>> with some unfinished updates Henry was working on, the real solution is >> to >>>> rewrite ":: based on the new rank code. But that should wait until the >> code >>>> is stable. Does anyone anticipate more changes? >>>> >>>> On a more philosophical note, ":: implements gerund left arguments that >>>> apply to the items cyclically. The reason for adding a new primitive and >>>> not extending ": is because it breaks using ": to define constant >>>> functions. If someone has any ideas to make them play nicely together >> then >>>> they can be merged into a single primitive. The issue is that there is >> no >>>> distinction between a noun and gerund. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -Thomas >>>> >>>> >>>> On 08/02/2017 11:52 AM, bill lam wrote: >>>> >>>>> Yes, I use Clang and have -Werror -Wextra in CFLAGS. >>>>> Sometimes vs2013 is much less tolerant. >>>>> >>>>> Ср, 02 авг 2017, Thomas Costigliola написал(а): >>>>> >>>>>> That looks like Henry's code taken from cr.c at some older version. It >>>>>> compiles fine for me in GCC and Visual Studio 2013. It is in the >>>>>> implementation of "::, which seems to be working in my tests, so that >>>>>> code >>>>>> never gets hit. Are you using Clang? It's much less tolerant of code >> like >>>>>> that. >>>>>> >>>>>> Regards, >>>>>> -Thomas >>>>>> >>>>>> On 08/02/2017 11:21 AM, bill lam wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> When I tried to compile, but this line in best.c failed. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> *((I*)0)=0; // scaf >>>>>>> >>>>>>> and I can not understand its intention, access to memory >>>>>>> address 0 should cause segfault. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Вт, 01 авг 2017, Jose Mario Quintana написал(а): >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> A brief description of the Jx v1.0 extensions, together with links >> to a >>>>>>>> Windows 64 bit dll, a Unix 64 bit so binaries and the patch >>>>>>>> corresponding >>>>>>>> to the J806 source can be found at, >>>>>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx1 >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Summary >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Spelling >>>>>>>> - Names with unicode characters >>>>>>>> - Primitives >>>>>>>> Added =.. =:: $:: [. ]. ]: ".. ":: `. ?: i.. O. >>>>>>>> Extended ~ $. >>>>>>>> - Foreign >>>>>>>> Added 104!:5 Unnamed Execution >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> - Trains >>>>>>>> a v Added (different from Jx v0) >>>>>>>> a a Extended (different from Jx v0) >>>>>>>> c a Resurrected >>>>>>>> a c a Resurrected >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Jx v0 page, >>>>>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx0 >>>>>>>> will be removed in the near future >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Time permitting, there will be soon a script with assertions for >> those >>>>>>>> who >>>>>>>> want to verify binaries targeted for other platforms and I will try >> to >>>>>>>> illustrate the facilities in action with some scripts. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Jose Mario Quintana < >>>>>>>> jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> The patches, a Windows 32-bit DLL, a cheatsheet, 32 and 64 bit Unix >>>>>>>>> libraries are found at: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/ >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> For more details and demonstration code, see the article in the >>>>>>>>> Journal of >>>>>>>>> J: http://journalofj.com/index.php/vol-2-no-2-october-2013 (only >> the >>>>>>>>> definition of the new conjunction knot (`.) has been slightly >>>>>>>>> modified for >>>>>>>>> the release). >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>>>> ---------- >>>>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/ >> forums.htm >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >> ---------- >>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/ >> forums.htm >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
