I also thought that it would be unlikely to brake any existing code [0].
It was implemented as " and broke an important code I had written! That
is why it was reimplemented as ":: instead.
[0] [Jprogramming] How m"n shoulda been defined Jose Mario Quintana
http://www.jsoftware.com/pipermail/programming/2015-August/042539.html
On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 3:36 PM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I expect to make some more improvements to dyad u"n, and eventually to
> rewrite the monad to match the dyad. My availability to work on this will
> be intermittent for a while. The 8.06 code as is works, and fixes a
> long-standing bug reported by Martin Neitzel.
>
> I have suggested using m"n, where n is not _, to implement a cyclic gerund
> m. If m doesn't look like a gerund, it would be treated as a simple noun.
> While this is not strictly compatible, I think it very unlikely that it
> would break any existing code. I think m"n was wrongly defined and that
> this is the correct definition. My opinion is not universally shared so I
> haven't acted on it.
>
> Henry Rich
>
> On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Costigliola <fo...@iocane.net>
> wrote:
>
> > You can try removing the conditional statement enclosing that line, but
> > for now I would say the patch is broken under Clang. Since the rank code
> > was completely rewritten in J805 and J806 and ":: is based on the J804
> rank
> > with some unfinished updates Henry was working on, the real solution is
> to
> > rewrite ":: based on the new rank code. But that should wait until the
> code
> > is stable. Does anyone anticipate more changes?
> >
> > On a more philosophical note, ":: implements gerund left arguments that
> > apply to the items cyclically. The reason for adding a new primitive and
> > not extending ": is because it breaks using ": to define constant
> > functions. If someone has any ideas to make them play nicely together
> then
> > they can be merged into a single primitive. The issue is that there is no
> > distinction between a noun and gerund.
> >
> > Regards,
> > -Thomas
> >
> >
> > On 08/02/2017 11:52 AM, bill lam wrote:
> >
> >> Yes, I use Clang and have -Werror -Wextra in CFLAGS.
> >> Sometimes vs2013 is much less tolerant.
> >>
> >> Ср, 02 авг 2017, Thomas Costigliola написал(а):
> >>
> >>> That looks like Henry's code taken from cr.c at some older version. It
> >>> compiles fine for me in GCC and Visual Studio 2013. It is in the
> >>> implementation of "::, which seems to be working in my tests, so that
> >>> code
> >>> never gets hit. Are you using Clang? It's much less tolerant of code
> like
> >>> that.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> -Thomas
> >>>
> >>> On 08/02/2017 11:21 AM, bill lam wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> When I tried to compile, but this line in best.c failed.
> >>>>
> >>>> *((I*)0)=0; // scaf
> >>>>
> >>>> and I can not understand its intention, access to memory
> >>>> address 0 should cause segfault.
> >>>>
> >>>> Вт, 01 авг 2017, Jose Mario Quintana написал(а):
> >>>>
> >>>>> A brief description of the Jx v1.0 extensions, together with links
> to a
> >>>>> Windows 64 bit dll, a Unix 64 bit so binaries and the patch
> >>>>> corresponding
> >>>>> to the J806 source can be found at,
> >>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx1
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Summary
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Spelling
> >>>>> - Names with unicode characters
> >>>>> - Primitives
> >>>>> Added =.. =:: $:: [. ]. ]: ".. ":: `. ?: i.. O.
> >>>>> Extended ~ $.
> >>>>> - Foreign
> >>>>> Added 104!:5 Unnamed Execution
> >>>>>
> >>>>> - Trains
> >>>>> a v Added (different from Jx v0)
> >>>>> a a Extended (different from Jx v0)
> >>>>> c a Resurrected
> >>>>> a c a Resurrected
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The Jx v0 page,
> >>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx0
> >>>>> will be removed in the near future
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Time permitting, there will be soon a script with assertions for
> those
> >>>>> who
> >>>>> want to verify binaries targeted for other platforms and I will try
> to
> >>>>> illustrate the facilities in action with some scripts.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Jose Mario Quintana <
> >>>>> jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> The patches, a Windows 32-bit DLL, a cheatsheet, 32 and 64 bit Unix
> >>>>>> libraries are found at:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For more details and demonstration code, see the article in the
> >>>>>> Journal of
> >>>>>> J: http://journalofj.com/index.php/vol-2-no-2-october-2013 (only
> the
> >>>>>> definition of the new conjunction knot (`.) has been slightly
> >>>>>> modified for
> >>>>>> the release).
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> >>>>> ----------
> >>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/
> forums.htm
> >>>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> >>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >>>
> >>
> >>
> > ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
> >
> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
>
----------------------------------------------------------------------
For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
