J interpreter must know when a noun is a gerund, so is it possible to add a new primitive to test for gerund? Or is there already J script to test for gerund?
Sent from my iPhone On 3 Aug, 2017, at 3:36 AM, Henry Rich <henryhr...@gmail.com> wrote: > I expect to make some more improvements to dyad u"n, and eventually to > rewrite the monad to match the dyad. My availability to work on this will > be intermittent for a while. The 8.06 code as is works, and fixes a > long-standing bug reported by Martin Neitzel. > > I have suggested using m"n, where n is not _, to implement a cyclic gerund > m. If m doesn't look like a gerund, it would be treated as a simple noun. > While this is not strictly compatible, I think it very unlikely that it > would break any existing code. I think m"n was wrongly defined and that > this is the correct definition. My opinion is not universally shared so I > haven't acted on it. > > Henry Rich > > On Wed, Aug 2, 2017 at 5:03 PM, Thomas Costigliola <fo...@iocane.net> wrote: > >> You can try removing the conditional statement enclosing that line, but >> for now I would say the patch is broken under Clang. Since the rank code >> was completely rewritten in J805 and J806 and ":: is based on the J804 rank >> with some unfinished updates Henry was working on, the real solution is to >> rewrite ":: based on the new rank code. But that should wait until the code >> is stable. Does anyone anticipate more changes? >> >> On a more philosophical note, ":: implements gerund left arguments that >> apply to the items cyclically. The reason for adding a new primitive and >> not extending ": is because it breaks using ": to define constant >> functions. If someone has any ideas to make them play nicely together then >> they can be merged into a single primitive. The issue is that there is no >> distinction between a noun and gerund. >> >> Regards, >> -Thomas >> >> >> On 08/02/2017 11:52 AM, bill lam wrote: >> >>> Yes, I use Clang and have -Werror -Wextra in CFLAGS. >>> Sometimes vs2013 is much less tolerant. >>> >>> Ср, 02 авг 2017, Thomas Costigliola написал(а): >>> >>>> That looks like Henry's code taken from cr.c at some older version. It >>>> compiles fine for me in GCC and Visual Studio 2013. It is in the >>>> implementation of "::, which seems to be working in my tests, so that >>>> code >>>> never gets hit. Are you using Clang? It's much less tolerant of code like >>>> that. >>>> >>>> Regards, >>>> -Thomas >>>> >>>> On 08/02/2017 11:21 AM, bill lam wrote: >>>> >>>>> When I tried to compile, but this line in best.c failed. >>>>> >>>>> *((I*)0)=0; // scaf >>>>> >>>>> and I can not understand its intention, access to memory >>>>> address 0 should cause segfault. >>>>> >>>>> Вт, 01 авг 2017, Jose Mario Quintana написал(а): >>>>> >>>>>> A brief description of the Jx v1.0 extensions, together with links to a >>>>>> Windows 64 bit dll, a Unix 64 bit so binaries and the patch >>>>>> corresponding >>>>>> to the J806 source can be found at, >>>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx1 >>>>>> >>>>>> Summary >>>>>> >>>>>> - Spelling >>>>>> - Names with unicode characters >>>>>> - Primitives >>>>>> Added =.. =:: $:: [. ]. ]: ".. ":: `. ?: i.. O. >>>>>> Extended ~ $. >>>>>> - Foreign >>>>>> Added 104!:5 Unnamed Execution >>>>>> >>>>>> - Trains >>>>>> a v Added (different from Jx v0) >>>>>> a a Extended (different from Jx v0) >>>>>> c a Resurrected >>>>>> a c a Resurrected >>>>>> >>>>>> The Jx v0 page, >>>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/jx0 >>>>>> will be removed in the near future >>>>>> >>>>>> Time permitting, there will be soon a script with assertions for those >>>>>> who >>>>>> want to verify binaries targeted for other platforms and I will try to >>>>>> illustrate the facilities in action with some scripts. >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Sat, Mar 8, 2014 at 11:40 PM, Jose Mario Quintana < >>>>>> jose.mario.quint...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>>> The patches, a Windows 32-bit DLL, a cheatsheet, 32 and 64 bit Unix >>>>>>> libraries are found at: >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> http://www.2bestsystems.com/foundation/j/ >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> For more details and demonstration code, see the article in the >>>>>>> Journal of >>>>>>> J: http://journalofj.com/index.php/vol-2-no-2-october-2013 (only the >>>>>>> definition of the new conjunction knot (`.) has been slightly >>>>>>> modified for >>>>>>> the release). >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------ >>>>>> ---------- >>>>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >>>> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm > ---------------------------------------------------------------------- > For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm ---------------------------------------------------------------------- For information about J forums see http://www.jsoftware.com/forums.htm
