I am open to a rename if the name is potentially offensive.

I share the same concerns as Julius, and I believe  that we should consider
the impact on searchability, and confusion among end users.

Cheers,
Suraj

On Fri, Sep 10, 2021 at 1:40 AM Matthias Rampke <[email protected]>
wrote:

> *resurrecting thread*
>
> I agree that we should rename it. I wince every time I need to call it by
> name. I often just call it prober anyway and even unaffiliated people
> immediately know what I'm talking about.
>
> More broadly, I think "blackbox" / "whitebox" monitoring is not very
> descriptive, and would propose using "probing" and "instrumentation"
> respectively.
>
> It would take a bit of transition planning, maybe with one "double
> release" under both names.
>
> What do the maintainers think?
>
> /MR
>
> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020, 18:49 Ben Kochie <[email protected]> wrote:
>
>> +1 for "prober". We could call it simply "prober". It more directly
>> describes what it's doing.
>>
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 12:35 PM Julius Volz <[email protected]>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Btw. in case we do end up going for a rename, I think Probe Exporter or
>>> Prober Exporter would be a nice and descriptive name for what it's doing
>>> (active probing of things).
>>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020, 12:03 Julius Volz <[email protected]> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> Good motivation, personally I think that kind of replacement is a good
>>>> thing to do with blacklist/whitelist (as is happening with flag names in
>>>> the Node Exporter). But I don't know how people feel about blackbox /
>>>> whitebox yet, as it doesn't carry the same negative/positive association
>>>> with colors. It would mean more invasive changes, like renaming the entire
>>>> repository and related documentation web pages, and potential Google
>>>> findability confusion (old blog posts etc. mentioning the old name).
>>>>
>>>> I haven't heard blackbox/whitebox crop up in the same way as e.g.
>>>> blacklist/whitelist yet, but would be interested to affected Black people's
>>>> opinion on whether this seems troublesome as well. If this turns out to be
>>>> offensive to affected people, that'd be a good argument for renaming it 
>>>> IMO.
>>>>
>>>> Julius
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Jun 11, 2020 at 11:29 AM Frederic Branczyk <[email protected]>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Hi all,
>>>>>
>>>>> I would like to propose to change all occurrences and namings within
>>>>> the Prometheus project of whitebox and blackbox monitoring. In itself the
>>>>> term Black box <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Black_box> doesn't seem
>>>>> to come from a racist background, but I think it's problematic when the
>>>>> opposite is "white", in particular as this has a connotation in relation 
>>>>> to
>>>>> whitelist/blacklist namings which are undoubtedly problematic. I would 
>>>>> like
>>>>> to propose to replace them with open/closed box monitoring, which not only
>>>>> removes any potential of being offensive, it actually conveys much more
>>>>> clearly what is meant without having to explain.
>>>>>
>>>>> The biggest impact this would have would be renaming of the
>>>>> blackbox_exporter <https://github.com/prometheus/blackbox_exporter>
>>>>> to closedbox_exporter, all other occurrences of this language seem to be
>>>>> limited to documentation.
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Frederic
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>>>> Groups "Prometheus Developers" group.
>>>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>>>> an email to [email protected].
>>>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/98b3d620-d0d6-4436-bf15-3d90915f7909o%40googlegroups.com
>>>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/98b3d620-d0d6-4436-bf15-3d90915f7909o%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>>>> .
>>>>>
>>>> --
>>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google
>>> Groups "Prometheus Developers" group.
>>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send
>>> an email to [email protected].
>>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6Yoyawu8gP7XU95jFyO24Dk_bZ8VnKy-7wUwHE%2BVDnRTcNQ%40mail.gmail.com
>>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CA%2BT6Yoyawu8gP7XU95jFyO24Dk_bZ8VnKy-7wUwHE%2BVDnRTcNQ%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>>> .
>>>
>> --
>> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
>> "Prometheus Developers" group.
>> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an
>> email to [email protected].
>> To view this discussion on the web visit
>> https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CABbyFmrju%2BxYo6pvjEOhNh-gFXa9%2BB5rKyHwXsSjgSy-KCSFSA%40mail.gmail.com
>> <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CABbyFmrju%2BxYo6pvjEOhNh-gFXa9%2BB5rKyHwXsSjgSy-KCSFSA%40mail.gmail.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>
>> .
>>
>

-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prometheus Developers" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/prometheus-developers/CAGv31%3Di6RTDaNzm%3DvDO7YFYOqyaOv3MJB-2Tegcjjwcptw%3D31g%40mail.gmail.com.

Reply via email to