Robert Edmonds wrote: > Hello, > > I'm disappointed at the lack of resolution to issue #488: > > https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=488 > > This puts a big burden on the Debian and Red Hat protobuf package > maintainers, because we have to patch protobuf to make it compile on > architectures beyond the limited set of architectures that are > explicitly supported in src/google/protobuf/stubs/platform_macros.h.
I should also clarify, it would be preferable to solve this in an architecture-independent way, perhaps by using compiler-dependent functionality (e.g., gcc's atomic intrinsics), rather than just by adding support for more architectures, because inevitably there will be more architectures in the future. -- Robert Edmonds -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
