Hi Robert, Can you help send a patch for this issue to https://codereview.appspot.com/ (and add me as a reviewer)? We'll commit it to svn once it's reviewed. I also pinged [email protected] <https://code.google.com/u/110106420545796050291/> who provided a patch for this issue some time ago. Not sure if he is still around. Are you both Debian/Red Hat maintainers?
On Wed, Aug 20, 2014 at 2:16 PM, Robert Edmonds <[email protected]> wrote: > Robert Edmonds wrote: > > Hello, > > > > I'm disappointed at the lack of resolution to issue #488: > > > > https://code.google.com/p/protobuf/issues/detail?id=488 > > > > This puts a big burden on the Debian and Red Hat protobuf package > > maintainers, because we have to patch protobuf to make it compile on > > architectures beyond the limited set of architectures that are > > explicitly supported in src/google/protobuf/stubs/platform_macros.h. > > I should also clarify, it would be preferable to solve this in an > architecture-independent way, perhaps by using compiler-dependent > functionality (e.g., gcc's atomic intrinsics), rather than just by > adding support for more architectures, because inevitably there will be > more architectures in the future. > > -- > Robert Edmonds > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Protocol Buffers" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to [email protected]. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. > Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Protocol Buffers" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected]. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. Visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/protobuf. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
