I will do some cleanup on this .. I already fixed the headers here on my copy
and I will do some cleanup on imports that were't supposed to be done.
On May 1, 2014, at 5:11 PM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com> wrote:
> As no mail arrived here or qpid-dev, and none seems to have arrived at what
> used to be the default location (infra-dev) either, I had a quick look and
> it seems like they might have changed the process slightly and we will need
> to ask for the mails to be enabled at all:
> I particularly like the mention of the new comment syncing between our
> mailing list and the Pull Requests.
> Regarding closing the pull requests, it seems like something along the
> lines of "This closes #<request number> at GitHub" added to the end of the
> svn commit message should do the trick:
> I havent had a chance to really look at the actual code change but when I
> was quickly scrolling down the PR, in addition to the licence headers on
> the new files that Rafi already mentioned (which I spotted due to the
> Copyright notices we wouldnt typically have) I noticed Encoder.java having
> its existing licence header corrupted a little by some wayward code.
> I just submitted it as a git PR:
> On Apr 30, 2014, at 10:47 AM, Robbie Gemmell <robbie.gemm...@gmail.com>
>> I think anyone can sign up for ReviewBoard themselves. It certainly didn't
>> used to be linked to the ASF LDAP in the past, presumably for that reason.
>> Its probably also worth noting you can initiate pull requests against the
>> github mirrors. If it hasn't already been done for the proton mirror, we
>> can have the emails that would generate be directed to this list (e.g.
>> We obviously can't merge the pull request via github, but you can use
>> the reviewing tools etc and the resultant patch can be downloaded or
>> attached to a JIRA and then applied in the usual fashion (I believe there
>> is a commit message syntax that can be used to trigger closing the pull
>> On 30 April 2014 15:22, Rafael Schloming <r...@alum.mit.edu> wrote:
>>> On Wed, Apr 30, 2014 at 8:35 AM, Clebert Suconic <csuco...@redhat.com
>>>> @Rafi: I see there is a patch review process within Apache (based on
>>>> other thread on Java8)
>>>> Should we make this through the patch process at some point?
>>> I'm fine looking at it on your git branch, but if you'd like to play with
>>> the review tool then feel free. Just let me know if you need an account
>>> and I will try to remember how to set one up (or who to bug to get you
>>> one). ;-)