On Nov 22, 6:21 pm, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
wrote:
> While maybe not a good fit for core (most of the users wouldn't use it),
> those seem definitely useful. I'll hope you'll still share them somehow
> (public dir in your svn repo is an option).
I'd like to emphasize this. Despite the vast size increase in
Prototype from 1.5 to 1.6, we still want to keep the API as small as
possible. If we don't want to include something, then, we're not
saying that the proposed feature has no value to anyone; it just
wouldn't be useful to enough people to warrant including it in core.
We are enthusiastic when users of Prototype create plugins, and even
happier when they document and maintain them. Doing so will lead to
fame, fortune, and prowess with the opposite sex. The fame will come
from inclusion in kangax's excellent Scripteka site (http://
scripteka.com) and a near-guarantee of an Ajaxian post; the other two
you'll have to figure out on your own.
Should we make a blog post about this? I notice we still haven't
mentioned Scripteka on the blog, so it might be useful to use that
same post to encourage people to write formal plugins.
> 4. Date.succ - enabling Date ranges? I say why not.
I agree. We're touching the Date object already, so adding this in
would mean fewer than 5 new lines of code.
Cheers,
Andrew
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/prototype-core?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
