This is a bit off topic, but what would be the ideal process of
submitting patches for you guys?
It seems to me that the trac bugtracker is pretty much ignored, so
should I send patches to this ML. And should I send multiple patches,
or one big patch from which you can pick what you feel would be a good

On Nov 22, 1:20 pm, "Mislav Marohnić" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> On Nov 22, 2007 11:57 AM, Viktor Kojouharov <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > I've made a ticket with an attached patch that adds a script insertion
> > method a few months ago, right here:
> >
> Whoa, that's a lot of code.
> I think the problem with this sort of functionality being in core is that a
> lot of people have different requirements for their apps and also optimize
> their code and asset files differently. We must take into account that most
> of our users might not use the feature at all, and that we may be
> introducing bloat to the framework then. I would welcome a cross-browser
> feature for dynamic script tag with callback only if it were a few lines
> long.
> Rest of the core team, what are your opinions on any of this becoming a part
> of the library? While dynamic script tag may not be so popular vs. bundling
> scripts into one optimized, gzipped file, I still think CSS injection could
> be a good addition. On the other hand, almost everything that can be
> accomplished with CSS injection can also be done with classname switching...
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Prototype: Core" group.
To post to this group, send email to
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at

Reply via email to