On Mon, 28 Feb 2011 13:53:51 -0800, Nathan Bergey <nat...@psas.pdx.edu> wrote:

> Yes, I think the main goal is to get people to think about GPS on rockets.
>  Even if we don't make an attempt this should be fun to watch.
> More (selfishly) importantly I've been invited on the Evadot podcast
> tomorrow morning to be an "expert" pundit of sorts about the contest and
> what is hard about it, what's easy, etc.
> Anyone have thoughts about it? Is it a good idea? Is it easy? How long will
> it take for someone to win? Hopefully I have my facts straight about GPS
> (yes I know about the ITAR or vs and in the cutoff
> conditions). Anything else relevant? Why not just fly and OEM board?

We've been assured by skytraq that they treat the ITAR limits as AND,
not OR. So, that chip should 'just work', aside from issues of kalman
filter lag.


Attachment: pgpPK0261BBHQ.pgp
Description: PGP signature

psas-team mailing list

This list's membership is automatically generated from the memberships of the 
psas-airframe, psas-avionics, and psas-general mail lists. Visit 
http://lists.psas.pdx.edu to individually subscribe/unsubscribe yourself from 
these lists.

Reply via email to