Could avoid double-posting on PSF-vote and PSF-community?
I'm presuming everyone here has some amount of mailing-list literacy ;-)
Le 01/06/2016 17:59, Ian Cordasco a écrit :
> This list has roughly always had the consensus that having ballots
> with candidates ordered differently was a good thing to avoid the
> ordering having a significant impact on the results of the election.
> Yes this is not an ideal way of using eVote, but it is the current
> solution we have chosen. Mark and I may work on making eVote handle
> randomization in the future, but I frankly doubt that will be fruitful
> given that the ballot is one large template and I'm unconvinced eVote
> could be modified in simple enough way to make the ballots random.
PSF-Community mailing list