Hi Slau, for as far as I can see, other services use the same protocols as the once from Avid. I searched for this in the manual, and automation is taken care of, also for plugin parameters. I will test this Myself soonly. If it works as good as the avid controlers, I let you know. The money aspect might be interesting. And why spend more then is needed? the idea of having an Avid device does not arouse me one bit. i wanna have a good and working controler. if thats a QCon pro, its fine by me. I let you know what my findings are. Maybe others can have some advantige of this to.And if it might be so, that this controlservice has any problems, I for sure will tell here. it is a fairly new product and has al the protocols, needed to work fine with Protools. Mac
> Op 25 mrt. 2015 om 22:17 heeft Slau Halatyn <slauhala...@gmail.com> het > volgende geschreven: > > As mentioned earlier, the best integration with Pro Tools is with the Avid > surfaces. Other surfaces use HUI emulation which, although it works, is not > the greatest. Further, taking a look at what U.s. retailers carry is a good > way to gauge the market. > > Slau > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an > email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Pro Tools Accessibility" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to ptaccess+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
