Detailed voting data available: Votes: 22.whether to accept amendments 23.approve directive http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+PV+20190326+RES-RCV+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN
Just these votes on Julia Reda's web page: https://juliareda.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/copyrightvote.pdf Mārtiņš On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:05 PM Jan Gerlach <[email protected]> wrote: > So close. More work to do towards national implementation. We'll have a > statement out later today. > > Thanks for your help, everyone! > > > > On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 4:59 AM Katherine Maher <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> So narrow, that hurts. >> >> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:56 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < >> [email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Sorry, that was the vote on whether to accept amendments. >>> >>> The Directive was approved 348-274. >>> >>> D >>> >>> На вт, 26.03.2019 г. в 12:53 ч. Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < >>> [email protected]> написа: >>> >>>> Directive approved >>>> by 5 votes >>>> 317 to 312 >>>> >>>> На вт, 26.03.2019 г. в 10:09 ч. Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < >>>> [email protected]> написа: >>>> >>>>> Hello all, >>>>> >>>>> Today after 12:30 we expect the European Parliament in Strasbourg to >>>>> vote on the copyright file. >>>>> >>>>> First there will be a vote on whether to allow amendments or just vote >>>>> the entire package as is. Only if there is a majority for that will votes >>>>> on deleting Articles 11 and 13 be allowed. I am attaching a voting list >>>>> with recommendations on Article 13, so you can follow the vote. >>>>> >>>>> Stream is here: >>>>> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/website/webstreaming.html?event=20190326-0900-PLENARY >>>>> >>>>> What happens if the reform is passed as is: >>>>> The Council will nod this off at a General Council meeting on 9 April. >>>>> Then it will be published in the official journal and Member States will >>>>> have 24 months to transpose the new rules. In this case we will work on >>>>> national implementations. There is a lot we can to remedy *some* of the >>>>> effects of Article 13 & open the door to future litigation. We can also >>>>> widen the gains some of the exceptions provide at least nationally. >>>>> >>>>> What happen is the European Parliament amends the reform: >>>>> The entire text goes to Council and then the Member States governments >>>>> need to decide if they accept it as is or want to further amend it and >>>>> negotiate with the EP. In this case we focus on the EP elections, as a >>>>> move >>>>> before them would be unlikely. >>>>> >>>>> Very hypothetical: >>>>> If a country, such as Germany for instance, suddenly changes its >>>>> behaviour on 9 April, it could theoretically still stop the package. But >>>>> copyright is already agreed upon in Council and put down as an "A item" >>>>> for >>>>> the 9 April meeting. A items are considered purely procedural, get nodded >>>>> off and not even discussed (as agreement and a vote have already taken >>>>> place). There is only one time, to my knowledge, that such an A item was >>>>> pulled back. The Software Patents Directive. I think it is extremely >>>>> unlikely to happen again. >>>>> >>>>> Thanks everyone for you help and support. >>>>> >>>>> Cheers from Strasbourg, >>>>> Dimi >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>> Publicpolicy mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >>> >> -- >> >> Katherine Maher (she/her) >> >> Executive Director >> >> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicpolicy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >> > _______________________________________________ > Publicpolicy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >
_______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
