Friends, we may have our disagreements with this songwriter from the 1990s, but let's stay polite!
On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 1:40 PM Owen Blacker <[email protected]> wrote: > Well he's quite the wanker, isn't he? > > > On Tue, 26 Mar 2019, 20:09 Liam Wyatt, <[email protected]> wrote: > >> And the very weird gloating has begun >> https://twitter.com/davidclowery/status/1110513807036727296?s=21 >> >> On Tue, 26 Mar 2019 at 20:54, Ryan Kaldari <[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >>> To look on the bright side, at least this means that we'll win the >>> Reiss-Engelhorn Museum v. Wikimedia Foundation lawsuit (due to article 14 >>> of the directive). As to the rest of it, quite disappointing indeed. >>> >>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 9:10 AM Jan Gerlach <[email protected]> >>> wrote: >>> >>>> Thanks for sending this over, Mārtiņš! >>>> >>>> Here's our statement: >>>> https://twitter.com/wikimediapolicy/status/1110572603217862656 >>>> >>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 7:31 AM Mārtiņš Bruņenieks <[email protected]> >>>> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Detailed voting data available: >>>>> >>>>> Votes: >>>>> 22.whether to accept amendments >>>>> 23.approve directive >>>>> >>>>> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/sides/getDoc.do?pubRef=-//EP//NONSGML+PV+20190326+RES-RCV+DOC+PDF+V0//EN&language=EN >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Just these votes on Julia Reda's web page: >>>>> https://juliareda.eu/wp-content/uploads/2019/03/copyrightvote.pdf >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> Mārtiņš >>>>> >>>>> >>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 2:05 PM Jan Gerlach <[email protected]> >>>>> wrote: >>>>> >>>>>> So close. More work to do towards national implementation. We'll have >>>>>> a statement out later today. >>>>>> >>>>>> Thanks for your help, everyone! >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> >>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 4:59 AM Katherine Maher <[email protected]> >>>>>> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>>>> So narrow, that hurts. >>>>>>> >>>>>>> On Tue, Mar 26, 2019 at 12:56 Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < >>>>>>> [email protected]> wrote: >>>>>>> >>>>>>>> Sorry, that was the vote on whether to accept amendments. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> The Directive was approved 348-274. >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> D >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>> На вт, 26.03.2019 г. в 12:53 ч. Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < >>>>>>>> [email protected]> написа: >>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> Directive approved >>>>>>>>> by 5 votes >>>>>>>>> 317 to 312 >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>> На вт, 26.03.2019 г. в 10:09 ч. Dimitar Parvanov Dimitrov < >>>>>>>>> [email protected]> написа: >>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Hello all, >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Today after 12:30 we expect the European Parliament in Strasbourg >>>>>>>>>> to vote on the copyright file. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> First there will be a vote on whether to allow amendments or just >>>>>>>>>> vote the entire package as is. Only if there is a majority for that >>>>>>>>>> will >>>>>>>>>> votes on deleting Articles 11 and 13 be allowed. I am attaching a >>>>>>>>>> voting >>>>>>>>>> list with recommendations on Article 13, so you can follow the vote. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Stream is here: >>>>>>>>>> http://www.europarl.europa.eu/website/webstreaming.html?event=20190326-0900-PLENARY >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What happens if the reform is passed as is: >>>>>>>>>> The Council will nod this off at a General Council meeting on 9 >>>>>>>>>> April. Then it will be published in the official journal and Member >>>>>>>>>> States >>>>>>>>>> will have 24 months to transpose the new rules. In this case we will >>>>>>>>>> work >>>>>>>>>> on national implementations. There is a lot we can to remedy *some* >>>>>>>>>> of the >>>>>>>>>> effects of Article 13 & open the door to future litigation. We can >>>>>>>>>> also >>>>>>>>>> widen the gains some of the exceptions provide at least nationally. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> What happen is the European Parliament amends the reform: >>>>>>>>>> The entire text goes to Council and then the Member States >>>>>>>>>> governments need to decide if they accept it as is or want to >>>>>>>>>> further amend >>>>>>>>>> it and negotiate with the EP. In this case we focus on the EP >>>>>>>>>> elections, as >>>>>>>>>> a move before them would be unlikely. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Very hypothetical: >>>>>>>>>> If a country, such as Germany for instance, suddenly changes its >>>>>>>>>> behaviour on 9 April, it could theoretically still stop the package. >>>>>>>>>> But >>>>>>>>>> copyright is already agreed upon in Council and put down as an "A >>>>>>>>>> item" for >>>>>>>>>> the 9 April meeting. A items are considered purely procedural, get >>>>>>>>>> nodded >>>>>>>>>> off and not even discussed (as agreement and a vote have already >>>>>>>>>> taken >>>>>>>>>> place). There is only one time, to my knowledge, that such an A item >>>>>>>>>> was >>>>>>>>>> pulled back. The Software Patents Directive. I think it is extremely >>>>>>>>>> unlikely to happen again. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks everyone for you help and support. >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> Cheers from Strasbourg, >>>>>>>>>> Dimi >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> >>>>>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>>> Publicpolicy mailing list >>>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >>>>>>>> >>>>>>> -- >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Katherine Maher (she/her) >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Executive Director >>>>>>> >>>>>>> Wikimedia Foundation <https://wikimediafoundation.org/> >>>>>>> >>>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>>> Publicpolicy mailing list >>>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >>>>>>> >>>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>>> Publicpolicy mailing list >>>>>> [email protected] >>>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >>>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Publicpolicy mailing list >>>>> [email protected] >>>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Publicpolicy mailing list >>>> [email protected] >>>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Publicpolicy mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >>> >> _______________________________________________ >> Publicpolicy mailing list >> [email protected] >> https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >> > _______________________________________________ > Publicpolicy mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy >
_______________________________________________ Publicpolicy mailing list [email protected] https://lists.wikimedia.org/mailman/listinfo/publicpolicy
