David Griffiths said : > I consider free software purists as inspirational people, even if I > don't choose to go as far as them. It's not for everyone, but it > shouldn't be sneered at either - there are serious issues at stake here.
The position of the FSF, RMS and co are much needed to balance the other side of the spectrum. No doubt. But it could be more encouraging when transitional efforts (such as the Puredyne community and its pragmatic position) are not put in the same category as open source free riders, which will unfortunately always happen in black/white vision of the world. Of course, the counter argument is that, the FSF would not be the FSF if it did not have such a dichotomic position ;) a. -- http://su.kuri.mu --- [email protected] http://identi.ca/group/puredyne irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
