2010/10/5 jaromil <[email protected]>: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > > re all, > > On Sat, Oct 02, 2010 at 01:52:35PM +0200, Aymeric Mansoux wrote: > >> The position of the FSF, RMS and co are much needed to balance the >> other side of the spectrum. No doubt. But it could be more >> encouraging when transitional efforts (such as the Puredyne >> community and its pragmatic position) are not put in the same >> category as open source free riders, which will unfortunately always >> happen in black/white vision of the world. >> >> Of course, the counter argument is that, the FSF would not be the >> FSF if it did not have such a dichotomic position ;) > > > *pragmatically speaking* i see that you are the only one having a > dichotomic position
nice rhetorical move ;) > since the dynebolic.org website had always a link > to pure:dyne and that is a 2-hop from the GNU.org website's > recommended GNU/Linux distributions. > > OTOH you have zero links to our dynebolic.org website. > > little details? but this is it. Yeah this is a good point. I wasn't a developer in the days when pd was db, but I've added a link and a sentence to the "about" page which I hope puts it in the correct light. Dynebolic has been inspirational for a long time, that's fo sho. The sentence is added in the repos, though I think it takes a little while for the public site to pull from it. https://code.launchpad.net/~puredyne-team/puredyne-www/trunk Dan > if you like to keep talking about imaginary things, well i hope other > people are at least entertained by it; if there was ever a transition, > i know well who is responsible for breaking it. > > ciao > > - -- > jaromil, dyne.org developer, http://jaromil.dyne.org --- [email protected] http://identi.ca/group/puredyne irc://irc.goto10.org/puredyne
