On Mon, Feb 2, 2009 at 11:01 AM, Wyatt Baldwin <[email protected]>wrote:
> > On Feb 2, 9:51 am, Jose Galvez <[email protected]> wrote: > > Tycon wrote: > > > sure but without client side code, it will have to reload a new page > > > in response for each user interaction > > > Rich Internet Applications rely on client side code to be as powerful > > > as desktop app, and GWT facilitates > > > that in a more comprehensive way than the simple javascript code > > > snippets, or javascript libraries > > > > Did I miss something, but doesn't the GWT simply end up writing the > > appropriate html pages for you with the embeded javascript? If thats > > correct, which I think it is (although I may be over simplifying things) > > It's that and another layer to wade through while debugging. > Especially fun if you're not sure if the bug is in your code or the > generated code. Wow, sounds too complicated, I think I'll stick with hacking JS for the moment > > > > > how is this more comprehensive then any of the other javascript > > libraries out there? Isn't the GWT just a different way of putting the > > code together? > > > > > On Feb 1, 10:55 am, Michael Bayer <[email protected]> wrote: > > > > >> On Feb 1, 2009, at 12:19 AM, Tycon wrote: > > > > >>> I'm not talking about facebook/youtube type sites, I'm talking about > a > > >>> real web application > > >>> where users access information, enter information, search and > analyze > > >>> information, and visualize information. > > > > >> which one of those is not supplied by facebook ? > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
