On Fri, 2011-06-24 at 09:34 -0700, Mike Orr wrote: > On Thu, Jun 23, 2011 at 3:38 PM, Chris McDonough <[email protected]> wrote: > > On Thu, 2011-06-23 at 16:32 -0500, Joe Dallago wrote: > >> ^^ Yah that's how I currently do it, but I think it would be nice to > >> have a separate set of "default" templates for each renderer. Any way > >> we could easily do that Chris? Like have a configuration setting of > >> some kind in the .ini possibly, where you can choose the renderer that > >> deform uses by default. Because the method you linked above would be > >> nice for the more obscure template renderers, but I think it might be > >> good to include Mako by default as well as Chameleon, as Mako is very > >> popular. > > > > I'd make a deform_mako package, put the templates in there, and tell > > folks how to configure deform to use those templates in the deform_mako > > docs. > > How close is Deform coming to being a standard or the most widely-used > form library?
It satisfies some people entirely, and other people very poorly. The folks it satisfies poorly tend to be people who need to do very layout-intensive "retail" forms with lots of irregular styling and arbitrary layout. They don't like it because it often it requires that they write Deform templates. This is a large percentage of people. So, not very close. > Is it ready to get an optional configuration in Akhet? > If so, somebody would need to tell me what the configuration should > be. I think probably not, given the above answer. If the next question is "what would it take to...", the answer is "I don't know". I haven't had much occasion to think about it, and won't soon (delta sponsored work entering the equation). - C -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "pylons-discuss" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected]. To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected]. For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/pylons-discuss?hl=en.
