Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> On 14/08/2006, at 1:42 AM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>>> Lets target this to be done for 3.3. We just need some agreement that
>>> proposed names are okay, plus a consensus on how we go about
>>> deprecating old names. Do we have an option now which if enabled
>>> prohibits use of old names and outputs some sort of warning if they
>>> are, or do we do something else?
>> Forgive the LaTex. Here is a list that I had started to compile. We'll
>> need to audit the affected bits of code to make sure they are actually
>> using the new namespace. I haven't given any thought to the deprecation
>> process though.
> How about in 3.3 we support new and old names and in 4.0 when old
> importer is done away with, we also do away with old names. In other
> words, 4.0 becomes where we stop supporting anything we are
> deprecating.  Can do the same thing with server cleanup functions.
> Stub them in 3.3 and remove them in 4.0.

Sounds like a good plan.


Reply via email to