Barry Warsaw wrote: > On Oct 30, 2019, at 14:31, Łukasz Langa luk...@langa.pl > wrote: > > Yes. This allows for synchronizing the schedule of > > Python release management with Fedora. They've been historically very > > helpful in early > > finding regressions not only in core Python but also in third-party > > libraries, helping > > moving the community forward. It seems like a bargain to make a slight > > adjustment of our > > schedule to help Fedora help us make 3.9 and beyond better releases. > > It would be really interesting for the major distros to work together, > coordinating their archive rebuilds with the new/beta releases. E.g. Ubuntu > might be > ahead of Fedora, or vice versa, for any particular new Python release. > Rebuilding the > whole archive with the new version as default always uncovered interesting > issues. It > seems like we have a great untapped resource to find good signals as to bugs, > breakages, > regressions, and other problems during the Python beta process. How can that > be leveraged > better?
I do ask that if there's going to be a discussion about distros working together and such that it be split off into its own thread to keep this one on-topic to be specific about the PEP's acceptance. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/ZOEKC4J4JJZKEHIM3J2KVI3OU7S45IM6/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
