On Thu., 31 Oct. 2019, 8:30 am Brett Cannon, <br...@python.org> wrote:
> Barry Warsaw wrote: > > On Oct 30, 2019, at 14:31, Łukasz Langa luk...@langa.pl > > wrote: > > > Yes. This allows for synchronizing the schedule of > > > Python release management with Fedora. They've been historically very > helpful in early > > > finding regressions not only in core Python but also in third-party > libraries, helping > > > moving the community forward. It seems like a bargain to make a slight > adjustment of our > > > schedule to help Fedora help us make 3.9 and beyond better releases. > > > It would be really interesting for the major distros to work together, > > coordinating their archive rebuilds with the new/beta releases. E.g. > Ubuntu might be > > ahead of Fedora, or vice versa, for any particular new Python release. > Rebuilding the > > whole archive with the new version as default always uncovered > interesting issues. It > > seems like we have a great untapped resource to find good signals as to > bugs, breakages, > > regressions, and other problems during the Python beta process. How can > that be leveraged > > better? > > I do ask that if there's going to be a discussion about distros working > together and such that it be split off into its own thread to keep this one > on-topic to be specific about the PEP's acceptance. > I think it also ties into the PEP 608 discussion of explicitly expanding our pre-release testing signals, so I'll take it up in that Discourse thread. Cheers, Nick. >
_______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/TGYFZET6RJLAIZUFXU2SXMUNCB3Y4NJD/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
