On Mon, 17 Jan 2022 at 06:52, Denis Kotov <redrad...@gmail.com> wrote: > > And that's why you need to do more work than arguing that in principle > > C++ is just a better language than C. We've been hearing that for 4 > > decades now (at least we greybeards have), and we've discovered that > > for many existing applications, C++ may be better but the cost of > > converting large swaths of C code to equivalent C++ that passes all > > tests is too big. Python may very well be one of them. > > So if you're not going to do the work to demonstrate big wins from > > using C++ instead of C in actual Python implementation code, I think > > you're wasting your posts. > > I thought about it, but will CPython accept the PR for this changes if it > would show benefits ?
We can't say that, no. The point here is that if you *don't* write such a PR and demonstration, nothing will change. If you do, then *maybe* it will get accepted, it depends if the benefits demonstrated by the PR are sufficient. The question is whether just having a *chance* of getting it in is sufficient to persuade you to produce such a PR. Paul. _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list -- python-dev@python.org To unsubscribe send an email to python-dev-le...@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman3/lists/python-dev.python.org/ Message archived at https://mail.python.org/archives/list/python-dev@python.org/message/QNUXQ66OKNET5AF6PNMZ5T6ZJWUTU7HV/ Code of Conduct: http://python.org/psf/codeofconduct/
