On 22/11/13 13:47, "Martin v. Löwis" wrote:
Am 22.11.13 10:00, schrieb Richard Tew:
That there are people who would consider using the trademark to force
us to change the name we've been using without harm for 14 years,
worries me. It's one thing to perhaps use it to stop someone scamming
Python users, and another to suggest using it as a weapon against us
for this? Really?
Unfortunately, Christian's original question was unclear. If his plan
had been to release "Python 2.8" (as his original question suggested),
then he would have faced quite some opposition (and, in a sense,
releasing a "python28.dll" is quite close to that).
The discussion is over, but I cannot let this comment go through without
citing my original question, again:
My question
-----------
I have created a very clean Python 2.7.6+ based CPython with the
Stackless
additions, that compiles with VS 2010, using the adapted project
structure
of Python 3.3.X, and I want to publish that on the Stackless website
as the
official "Stackless Python 2.8". If you consider Stackless as official
;-) .
Can it be that these sentences have morphed into something different
when going out to the mailing list? Or maybe there is a filter in the
brains?
If one removes the word "Stackless" everywhere, the above text reads
still almost syntactic correctly, but changes it's meaning a lot.
--
Christian Tismer :^) <mailto:tis...@stackless.com>
Software Consulting : Have a break! Take a ride on Python's
Karl-Liebknecht-Str. 121 : *Starship* http://starship.python.net/
14482 Potsdam : PGP key -> http://pgp.uni-mainz.de
phone +49 173 24 18 776 fax +49 (30) 700143-0023
PGP 0x57F3BF04 9064 F4E1 D754 C2FF 1619 305B C09C 5A3B 57F3 BF04
whom do you want to sponsor today? http://www.stackless.com/
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
