Ethan Furman wrote:
[Redirecting to Python Dev]
On 11/22/2013 10:25 AM, Richard Tew wrote:
>
Yet, we're told we should adopt wacky version numbers like 10, or
rename our project from Stackless Python.
Sometimes we have to do wacky stuff to avoid unnecessary confusion.
Maybe imaginary version numbers could be used?
Python 2.8j has a nice air of unreality about it. :-)
--
Greg
_______________________________________________
Python-Dev mailing list
Python-Dev@python.org
https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev
Unsubscribe:
https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com
