Am 22.11.13 17:54, schrieb Christian Tismer: > The discussion is over, but I cannot let this comment go through without > citing my original question, again: > >> My question >> ----------- >> >> I have created a very clean Python 2.7.6+ based CPython with the >> Stackless >> additions, that compiles with VS 2010, using the adapted project >> structure >> of Python 3.3.X, and I want to publish that on the Stackless website >> as the >> official "Stackless Python 2.8". If you consider Stackless as official >> ;-) . > > Can it be that these sentences have morphed into something different > when going out to the mailing list? Or maybe there is a filter in the > brains? > If one removes the word "Stackless" everywhere, the above text reads > still almost syntactic correctly, but changes it's meaning a lot.
Hmm. This isn't the original *question*. Instead, the question read # Can I rely on PEP 404 that the "Python 2.8" namespace never will clash # with CPython? So while the word "Stackless" wasn't removed everywhere, it certainly wasn't in the question. Regards, Martin _______________________________________________ Python-Dev mailing list Python-Dev@python.org https://mail.python.org/mailman/listinfo/python-dev Unsubscribe: https://mail.python.org/mailman/options/python-dev/archive%40mail-archive.com