Phoebus R. Dokos wrote: > > This is the reason why if you move the mouse cursor using the keyboard > > the movement looks a bit more jerky on QPC than on the original > > hardware, where the PE can rely on the frame interrupt. > I don't know about that since it looks fine to me!
I can clearly see it on both my 400Mhz K6-III and the 800Mhz Athlon of my father. Did you compare it to an original QL? > Nonetheless to prove my point I used the MEMORY_MOVE command on QPC2 > as follows: Well, can't check it, I don't use Turbo and have neither the mood nor the time to set it up. By the way, if you use the PE save/restore calls instead of own memory copy routines you can automatically gain from the accelerated 16bit routines of QPC. And on native platforms it's probably not much slower than any other memory copy routine. Marcel
