On 23-Dec-98 23:14:10, Adam D. McKenna wrote something about "Re: Frivolous forking".
I just couldn't help replying to it, thus:
> It basically comes down to this: If redhat is as security-conscious as it
> claims to be (or at least as security-conscious as some people on this list
> claim it is), they would have found a way to include qmail in their OS.
No, that is exactly why they can _not_ include qmail. They are not allowed
to distribute modified versions, which means that as security holes are
found, they can't fix them and distribute their fixed versions.
Regards,
/������������������������������T�����������������������������������������\
| Rask Ingemann Lambertsen | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
| Registered Phase5 developer | WWW: http://www.gbar.dtu.dk/~c948374/ |
| A4000, 775 kkeys/s (RC5-64) | "ThrustMe" on XPilot and EFnet IRC |
| Es funktioniert nicht, sieht aber gut aus. |
