Matthew Soffen wrote/schrieb/scribsit: > At 01:16 PM 12/29/98 +0100, Rask Ingemann Lambertsen wrote: >>On 23-Dec-98 23:14:10, Adam D. McKenna wrote something about > "Re: Frivolous forking". I just couldn't help replying to it, thus: >> No, that is exactly why they can _not_ include qmail. They are not >> allowed >>to distribute modified versions, which means that as security holes are >>found, they can't fix them and distribute their fixed versions. > > Name 1 security hole found in qmail that they would have had to fix. Name one vendor that would fix s.th. they didn't f**k up before. Stefan
- Re: Frivolous forking Russ Allbery
- Re: Frivolous forking Scott Ballantyne
- Re: Frivolous forking Russ Allbery
- Re: Frivolous forking Roger Merchberger
- Re: Frivolous forking Jose de Leon
- Re: Frivolous forking Mario Niessner
- Re: Frivolous forking Scott Ballantyne
- Re: Frivolous forking Adam D. McKenna
- Re: Frivolous forking Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Frivolous forking Matthew Soffen
- Re: Frivolous forking Stefan Paletta
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- Re: Frivolous forking Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Frivolous forking Peter C. Norton
- Re: Frivolous forking Vince Vielhaber
- Re: Frivolous forking Rask Ingemann Lambertsen
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking Mate Wierdl
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
- Re: Frivolous forking John Gonzalez/netMDC admin
