Re: [Q] qmail speed "again"

[Dave Sill]

Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
>The 'qmail for outgoing' claim is correct. The 'zmailer for incoming'
>claim is very ridiculous.

See:

    http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1997/08/msg01208.html
    http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1998/05/msg00660.html

They may not be running it now, but they used to.

-Dave