On Mon, Apr 12, 1999 at 12:13:06PM -0400, Dave Sill wrote:
> Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >The 'qmail for outgoing' claim is correct. The 'zmailer for incoming'
> >claim is very ridiculous.
>
> See:
>
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1997/08/msg01208.html
> http://www.ornl.gov/its/archives/mailing-lists/qmail/1998/05/msg00660.html
>
> They may not be running it now, but they used to.
I stand corrected. First time I checked there was no zmailer involved there :)
Greetz, Peter
--
| 'He broke my heart, | Peter van Dijk |
I broke his neck' | [EMAIL PROTECTED] |
nognixz - As the sun | Hardbeat@ircnet - #cistron/#linux.nl |
| Hardbeat@undernet - #groningen/#kinkfm/#vdh |
