On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 02:07:27PM +0000, Uwe Ohse wrote:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:39:11PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
>
> > It has nothing to do with a personal fight. I had a coversation with Theo
> > deRaadt about this issue. Removing qmail from the ports tree is just due to
> > its incompatible license. Nobody is really sure wether a port of qmail &
>
> Oh, then the OBSD people will remove the netscape ports soon, right?
> No? Oh, come on, _that_ one is clearly incompatible.
No, it isn't. It's incompatible for integration in the base system, but not
for the ports - the netscape port is a binary installation. On the other
hand it isn't clear wether an installation as done through the ports system
from source is legal or not. If djb clearly states it is legal qmail &
friends will be back in.
> But anyway, i was never tempted to use the qmail port anyway. Installing
> qmail quite easy anyway.
Ack.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
