* Peter van Dijk <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Thu, Aug 30, 2001 at 03:25:44PM +0200, Olivier M. wrote:
>> http://www.sigmasoft.com/~openbsd/archive/openbsd-ports/200108/msg00462.html
> Basically, [the port maintainers] are too stubborn to create a port
> that installs according to djb's instructions, with a big fat warning
> or *whatever*. I think it's stupid, but that's just my two eurocents.
It's not just stupid, it's entirely brain damaged, because a port (unlike
a package) does not fall under DJB's redistribution restrictions (the
Debian .deb uses the same mechanism AFAIK). Whatever.
> Let's not get into a flamewar here.
Nope.
> There is nothing wrong with djb's licensing.
There isn't, indeed. There is, however, something fundamentally flawed
with Theo's perception of reality, and I'm this ->|<- close to dropping
OpenBSD in favour of $SECURE_OTHER_UNIX on my servers. The ipf incident
was sad but somehow justifiable. This is justifiable but stupid. *grrr*
