On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 02:01:54PM +0000, Uwe Ohse wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 31, 2001 at 01:28:57PM +0200, Henning Brauer wrote:
> > > that the whole point of this discussion is that OpenBSD removed the
> > > port because they felt they were not *allowed* to violate this
> > > consistency).
> > They are not allowed to do so.
> they are not allowed to behave so stupid. Exactly.
Nonsense. Is it really so hard to get? djb's software doesn't fulfill the
rules for the OpenBSD ports tree due to install locations and changing them
isn't allowed. Neither Dan is willing to change the license nor are the
OpenBSD ports tree guys willing to change their rules. It's that simple. No
relgious war, no djb license banging, just incompatible rules.
--
* Henning Brauer, [EMAIL PROTECTED], http://www.bsws.de *
* Roedingsmarkt 14, 20459 Hamburg, Germany *
Unix is very simple, but it takes a genius to understand the simplicity.
(Dennis Ritchie)
