On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 14:21 +0000, Martin Ritchie wrote:
> On 14/03/2008, Robert Godfrey <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >
> >  >
> >  > I would like to say that it is all very well having a single time when
> >  > we sit down and code review. That SHOULD NOT meant it is the only
> >  > time. I would like to see us be more proactive in reviewing commits as
> >  > they occur. If various groups wish to sit down and review the code
> >  > independently and report back that is ok by me. But we must remember
> >  > to be inclusive and a single dial in point is not going to cover that.
> >  > If review was occurring continually then there would be no need for
> >  > the weekly call. Something I'm sure we can work towards.
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Agreed... but the problem with diffuse collective repsonsibility like this
> >  (saying everyone *should* be reviewing everything) is that no-one in
> >  particular takes responsibility for it.  Until we are better at it I think
> >  we all need to be working together at explicit time.
> 
> Totally agree, any steps we can take that will lead to better process
> is something we should all be behind. I just wanted to highlight the
> direction we should be aiming to get to. Set review time is way better
> than 'should' review that never happends.

Getting into the habit of proactively reviewing commits would ease (and
certainly speedup) the collective review. So I totally agree that both
are needed. 

What about having our collective review day on Fridays? 10 am EST may be
a good time. 

Arnaud


Reply via email to