Hi All, +1 for Fridays.
Regards, Marnie On 3/18/08, Rajith Attapattu <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 from me as well. > > Rajith > > On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 15:43 +0000, Robert Godfrey wrote: > > > > > > > > First off I very much like the proposed process and I'm a big +1 on > > it, > > > > and I also completely agree that diffuse responsibility is an issue. > > To > > > > that end we could, in addition to the proposed process, select a > lead > > > > for each of the various components of qpid. I'm thinking the > > > > responsibilities of each lead might be to manage JIRAs, and run the > > code > > > > review for that component. > > > > > > > > I think something like this could work well with the proposed > process > > > > and provide some non diffuse responsibility without saddling any > > single > > > > person with e.g. the load of cleaning up all the JIRAs. > > > > > > > > > > > > Yes - I think that's an excellent idea, and would be quite happy to > > > volunteer for the Java Broker, or for the whole Java side. > > > > > > -- Rob > > > > > > --Rafael > > > > > > > > I am also adding my big +1 for the idea and for Rob being our Java lead. > > I would like to volunteer for assisting Rob with the Java client side. I > > think that I am also volunteering for .Net. > > > > Arnaud > > > > > > > > > -- > Regards, > > Rajith Attapattu > Red Hat > blog: http://rajith.2rlabs.com/ >
