+1 from me as well. Rajith
On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 11:17 AM, Arnaud Simon <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On Fri, 2008-03-14 at 15:43 +0000, Robert Godfrey wrote: > > > > > > First off I very much like the proposed process and I'm a big +1 on > it, > > > and I also completely agree that diffuse responsibility is an issue. > To > > > that end we could, in addition to the proposed process, select a lead > > > for each of the various components of qpid. I'm thinking the > > > responsibilities of each lead might be to manage JIRAs, and run the > code > > > review for that component. > > > > > > I think something like this could work well with the proposed process > > > and provide some non diffuse responsibility without saddling any > single > > > person with e.g. the load of cleaning up all the JIRAs. > > > > > > > > Yes - I think that's an excellent idea, and would be quite happy to > > volunteer for the Java Broker, or for the whole Java side. > > > > -- Rob > > > > --Rafael > > > > > I am also adding my big +1 for the idea and for Rob being our Java lead. > I would like to volunteer for assisting Rob with the Java client side. I > think that I am also volunteering for .Net. > > Arnaud > > > -- Regards, Rajith Attapattu Red Hat blog: http://rajith.2rlabs.com/
