BTW for me it would be interesting to OSGify the code 4.6 code base once
more.

I'll try to find some time in the next week.

Tom

Am 11.01.10 00:47, schrieb Tom Schindl:
> Am 10.01.10 23:29, schrieb Helge Fredriksen:
>> Hello!
>>
>> I think we need more contributors on the qt-jambi work. Today, there are
>> only me and Francis Galiegue that try to maintain the QtJambi framework.
>> The project is far to complex for only us two to be able to be able to
>> take care of everything.
>>
>> We need to setup some kind of project to maintain this. It seems that
>> Gunnar and Eskil from Nokia is totally out of loop now, not even minor
>> questions on the list about the generator seems to catch any attention
>> from the authors.
>>
>> Is there any willing to contribute? We should try to compile a list of
>> what has to be done to get the first community release on Qt 4.6 going.
>>
>> On the top of my head:
>>
>>    1. Get the development packages up and running on the main Linux
>>       distros in addition to a tar.gz archive.
>>    2. Get a Windows 7 release packaged.
>>    3. Hopefully get someone on with a Mac to contribute with a release here.
> 
> I can certainly build them (I already compiled my own 4.5-Version
> because I was in need of OSGI-enabled versions).
> 
>>    4. Get the javadoc working again (I've managed to compile it, but
>>       it's lot of stuff missing which is found in the Qt doc).
>>    5. Get the examples working and bundle them in the various packages.
>>    6. Get in control of the Qt Jambi generator.
>>
>> In the waiting of an Atlassian Jira installation to be hosted on a
>> proper place, I suggest we use the sourceforge project for the purpose
>> of maintaining this list. All willing to contribute should be given
>> admin access to this project at sourceforge, so tickets can issed to the
>> various team members.
> 
> So you only do that because you want a bug tracker right (source code
> stays in gitorus)? I could offer you my OpenSource-Servers bugtracker
> [1] named mantis. It is not as cool as Jira but I think it would be good
> enough.
> 
> Tom
> 
> [1]https://bugs.tomsondev.com/mantis/login_page.php
> _______________________________________________
> Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
> [email protected]
> http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest

_______________________________________________
Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest

Reply via email to