No, I didn't know about this! Very interesting.

Bruno, maybe you can have a look and see what effort we had to put into QtJambi to bring in the work of PySide?
If there are people maintaining the PySide version of the generator, and we are able to use it more or less directly,
we would certainly have solved one of the biggest obstacles in this project!

Helge

Gregor Mückl wrote:
-------- Original-Nachricht --------
  
Datum: Tue, 12 Jan 2010 08:09:08 -0500
Von: Adam Batkin <[email protected]>
An: [email protected]
Betreff: Re: [Qt-jambi-interest] Request for contributors
    

  
I can help contribute to a Mac release. My particular interest is in 
making the Generator work better, so it can be run independently. Though 
it sounds like Francis may have already started working on that, which 
is great.

-Adam Batkin

    

Hi!

This is slightly OT here, but have any of you checked out what is happening with PySide? They have a generator that is as far as I understand it based on the one in Qt Jambi, but they also claim it to be much more generic and independent of the actual language. If parts of the generator in Qt Jambi could be replaced by the stuff from PySide this would reduce the effort required, wouldn't it?

Regards,
Gregor

  

_______________________________________________
Qt-jambi-interest mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.trolltech.com/mailman/listinfo/qt-jambi-interest

Reply via email to