On 10/7/11 11:18 AM, "ext Yves Bailly" <yves.bai...@sescoi.fr> wrote:

>Le 07/10/2011 10:48, lars.kn...@nokia.com a écrit :
>> On 10/7/11 10:26 AM, "ext Yves Bailly"<yves.bai...@sescoi.fr>  wrote:
>> [...]
>>> Is QML suited in such cases?
>>
>> It's most likely better suited for the task then QWidgets. Only problem
>> could be if you need some functionality that we don't support in QML
>>yet.
>
>Well, I need pretty everything QWidget-based classes provide, and a bit
>more...
>Combos, stacks and tabs, lists, tables and trees (model-based or not,
>some items
>may be full widgets), splitters, groups, some delegates here and there...
>even a
>checkbox or a label sometimes ;-) Not talking about layouts of course.
>All of this being build and filled dynamically at runtime.
>
>Now if QML is said to be better suited for such cases, then maybe I
>should find
>some hours (days?) to really learn it.

Well, right now some of the functionality that you mention above is still
missing. We'll get there eventually. But it is most likely easier to
create a UI dynamically than with QWidgets.

Cheers,
Lars

_______________________________________________
Qt5-feedback mailing list
Qt5-feedback@qt.nokia.com
http://lists.qt.nokia.com/mailman/listinfo/qt5-feedback

Reply via email to