I stand corrected :-)
On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 10:10 PM, John O'Laughlin <[email protected]> wrote: > On Mon, Jan 26, 2009 at 9:16 PM, John Van Pelt <[email protected]> wrote: >> What is the basis of your computation? Just the predefined Quackle >> superleaves? or some other algorithm? >> >> I find it hard to believe a lot of these, ABERRS to cite one. surely >> BARES, or even SEAR, is better than doubled R's. > > I can believe it. Another one I found back in the day is CCEHOS. > > John > > ------------------------------------ > > Yahoo! Groups Links > > > >
