The 6 speed box is narrower as it has twin output shafts (internally) with 3 gears on each rather than one shaft with 5 (or 6) gears on. 6th is about the same ratio as 5th on a 5 speed box so unless you like changing gear or have an engine with a narrow power band i don't think it's worth it.

Jim


On 08/05/2020 23:29, 'JR' via Quantum Owners Group wrote:
Thanks for the  pics Russ - very nice - looks like a super neat conversion. From your info the it sounds like there is about 6.5mm total clearance with a zetec blacktop + BC/IB5 gerabox (3mm each side). I am expecting to have to fabricate some mounting hardware (never seen any advertised for Mk2 Fiesta conversion) and do exhaust mods. The IB5 with rear mount starter also sounds the best way to go - the front mount motor on cvh is too close to exhaust (XR2) even with short version motor.. I thought the 6 speed box might be wider but Jim has posted that it is actually narrower - still too much effort to fit though.
John


On Friday, 8 May 2020 12:02:19 UTC+1, russ price wrote:


    Looks like the engine/gearbox has moved fractionaly to the n/s,
    clearance is now less than 1/2 mm on gearbox end and 6mm at the
    other. The engine mounts now fitted came with car, offhand i can't
    remember the make but they aren't Ford, i'm pretty sure i saw
    receipt for £50+ for just one. A number parts came with car for
    upgrades, not all fitted but they are all quite expensive and seem
    to be good quality. Gearbox is IB5 with rear starter motor,
    thought about 6 speed but decided not worth the trouble. If you go
    to imgbb i've put some pics in folder ST170 :-
    https://vitesse.imgbb.com/albums <https://vitesse.imgbb.com/albums>
    Russ


    On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 9:34:32 AM UTC+1, JR  wrote:

        1mm clearance sounds super tight! - you must have some really
        good engine mounts to stop that hitting. Do you have a 6 speed
        box or BC/IB5? Front or rear starter motor? On my cvh + BC 5
        spd there is better clearance than 1mm on gearbox end. Maybe
        fiitting a zetec blacktop needs the whole of the power unit
        moving slightly towards nearside to make it fit?
        With regards induction I will be using a cvh efi./turbo up and
        over alloy inlet manifold with some adapter plates (single
        throttle body) - this should make it easier to move to turbo
        later once the basic conversion has been sorted. Had a re-read
        of nickp;s thread - thanks for reminder.
        John


        On Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 10:37:53 AM UTC+1, russ price wrote:

             In that case it is the same size as the ST engine fitted
            in mine. I didn't do the conversion but i had to change
            the engine so have some idea of how it's done. The
            clearance at the crankpulley end is quite tight but it is
            possible without cutting anything, clearance at the
            gearbox end is even worse 1mm only. I'll take and post
            some pics later, The exhaust has had some work done to
            squeeze it in. The biggest problem however is on the
            induction side i don't see how it would be possible to use
            the original system, mine is running on bike carbs and
            that still a bit of a squeeze. Engine mounts need to be
            pretty firm and a head steady is a good idea.  Just
            realised the topic started by the chap who did the
            conversion is still on proboards forum take a look at
            ST170 Saloon posted by nickp.
            Russ

            On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 3:41:57 PM UTC+1, JR wrote:

                Looking to replace my saloon cvh lump with a 2 litre
                zetec blacktop motor. Anyone have any experience of
                this... tips.problems . pointers etc?

                Most of the info I have found relates to using the old
                silvertop zetec engine - I won'r be using one of those
                (too old/rare/expensive in comparison to plentiful
                cheap blacktops)

                I don't see any problems with manifolds, loom,
                injection, ecu etc. (I will be using aftermarket ecu/efi)

                Biggest problem I see is very tight fit/access in
                engine bay at crank pulley/cambelt end. Ideally I do
                not want to be cutting inner panel.

                John


--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or related message(s).
---
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to [email protected] <mailto:[email protected]>. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quantumowners/7ffd1ca4-ab15-463c-90af-49a54c7e11e3%40googlegroups.com <https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quantumowners/7ffd1ca4-ab15-463c-90af-49a54c7e11e3%40googlegroups.com?utm_medium=email&utm_source=footer>.

--
--
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum 
Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners Club nor 
the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the preparation of the 
above information shall have any liability to any person or entity with respect to 
liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be caused directly or indirectly by the 
instructions contained within this or related message(s).
--- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quantumowners/0b388e5c-48c1-5a80-1b32-d237181fdb5a%40quantums.info.

Reply via email to