Looks like the engine/gearbox has moved fractionaly to the n/s, clearance 
is now less than 1/2 mm on gearbox end and 6mm at the other. The engine 
mounts now fitted came with car, offhand i can't remember the make but they 
aren't Ford, i'm pretty sure i saw receipt for £50+ for just one. A number 
parts came with car for upgrades, not all fitted but they are all quite 
expensive and seem to be good quality. Gearbox is IB5 with rear starter 
motor, thought about 6 speed but decided not worth the trouble. If you go 
to imgbb i've put some pics in folder ST170 :- 
https://vitesse.imgbb.com/albums
Russ


On Friday, May 8, 2020 at 9:34:32 AM UTC+1, JR  wrote:
>
> 1mm clearance sounds super tight! - you must have some really good engine 
> mounts to stop that hitting. Do you have a 6 speed box or BC/IB5? Front or 
> rear starter motor? On my cvh + BC 5 spd there is better clearance than 1mm 
> on gearbox end. Maybe fiitting a zetec blacktop needs the whole of the 
> power unit moving slightly towards nearside to make it fit?
> With regards induction I will be using a cvh efi./turbo up and over alloy 
> inlet manifold with some adapter plates (single throttle body) - this 
> should make it easier to move to turbo later once the basic conversion has 
> been sorted. Had a re-read of nickp;s thread - thanks for reminder.
> John
>  
>
> On Thursday, May 7, 2020 at 10:37:53 AM UTC+1, russ price wrote:
>>
>>  In that case it is the same size as the ST engine fitted in mine. I 
>> didn't do the conversion but i had to change the engine so have some idea 
>> of how it's done. The clearance at the crankpulley end is quite tight but 
>> it is possible without cutting anything, clearance at the gearbox end is 
>> even worse 1mm only. I'll take and post some pics later, The exhaust has 
>> had some work done to squeeze it in. The biggest problem however is on the 
>> induction side i don't see how it would be possible to use the original 
>> system, mine is running on bike carbs and that still a bit of a squeeze. 
>> Engine mounts need to be pretty firm and a head steady is a good idea.  
>> Just realised the topic started by the chap who did the conversion is still 
>> on proboards forum take a look at ST170 Saloon posted by nickp.
>> Russ 
>>
>> On Tuesday, May 5, 2020 at 3:41:57 PM UTC+1, JR wrote:
>>>
>>> Looking to replace my saloon cvh lump with a 2 litre zetec blacktop 
>>> motor. Anyone have any experience of this... tips.problems . pointers etc?
>>>
>>> Most of the info I have found relates to using the old silvertop zetec 
>>> engine - I won'r be using one of those (too old/rare/expensive in 
>>> comparison to plentiful cheap blacktops)
>>>
>>> I don't see any problems with manifolds, loom, injection, ecu etc. (I 
>>> will be using aftermarket ecu/efi)
>>>
>>> Biggest problem I see is very tight fit/access in engine bay at crank 
>>> pulley/cambelt end. Ideally I do not want to be cutting inner panel.
>>>
>>> John
>>>
>>>
>>>

-- 
-- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to 
[email protected]
For more options, visit this group at 
http://groups.google.com/group/quantumowners?hl=en

IMPORTANT NOTE: All information presented herewith is provided on an "As Is" 
basis, without warranty or the implication thereof. Neither the Quantum Owners 
Club nor the individuals associated with the Quantum Owners Club or in the 
preparation of the above information shall have any liability to any person or 
entity with respect to liability, loss, or damage caused or alleged to be 
caused directly or indirectly by the instructions contained within this or 
related message(s).
--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Quantum Owners Group" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
To view this discussion on the web visit 
https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/quantumowners/21da3981-ad77-4228-b8ff-a696ede7d89f%40googlegroups.com.

Reply via email to