On Saturday, August 5, 2017 at 8:28:37 AM UTC, Marek Marczykowski-Górecki wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA256 > > On Sat, Aug 05, 2017 at 04:04:27AM -0400, P R wrote: > > Hello Marek, > > > > Am 05.08.2017 9:44 vorm. schrieb "Marek Marczykowski-Górecki" < > > marma...@invisiblethingslab.com>: > > > > On Fri, Aug 04, 2017 at 10:28:45PM > > > Start failed: internal error: libxenlight failed to create new domain > > > 'sys-firewall' > > > > Make sure you have VT-x and VT-d enabled in BIOS. > > > > > > Indeed, I have checked BIOS setting and vt-d was disabled for some strange > > reason (it was enabled under Qubes 3.2 before). > > > > If I try to start the AppVMs and also the Fedora-25 Template VM I get the > > same error. > > As I also got the message at the end of the Qubes installation process, do > > you suggest to reinstall, now that vt-d is enabled? > > > > Another strange issue is that I can only see 'Start' in the list of > > available applications in all Fedora VMs. > > > > As I haven't read this before, it seems that something is broken. > > Guess reinstalling is the best option?? > > Probably yes - without VT-x and VT-d, initial configuration failed. > > - -- > Best Regards, > Marek Marczykowski-Górecki > Invisible Things Lab > A: Because it messes up the order in which people normally read text. > Q: Why is top-posting such a bad thing? > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- > Version: GnuPG v2 > > iQEcBAEBCAAGBQJZhYGuAAoJENuP0xzK19csojcH/iilrBnK1RpMqsB1SNP/MXmh > kD08X+4JgEImhph2xHWzKbU5DCb4gmVlfvfLdSOmvybE3G9QqAEyZouUN13/jW/O > LrTqZVRxC4eLqKZNI2lXc4AQHc5QATKaZoAFXmKMQerV/BTz9F9oD1IZYCWbPyzp > scDIFR4qRZXBEmqinqCTDI+vNwng7ZV0M+WOoD9Poq+RTc03vILeySb4uVAbPt++ > Nmt3nwDHG/W5hIPhD+XfWOIh2stjK1GX/0bwEcmp8+JBd0WL8OqzhJfX6ROF+AFo > ZxH1nwpKuEtcs74bcPWurNQ5sopqiT/+4mxdegg38o2OO1RL5QvVUjOwtimAu0M= > =qYuI > -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Marek, no ill intentions meant here, but the concerns of the release isn't just technical ones. There are questions regarding which target group whom Qubes want to spend time and resources on. Will these issues not be addressed? Are there no one in the Qubes team whom work with with public relation role, to address these issues,, especially during a major release? Again, no ill intentions here, but it would be nice to know if your focus is now entirely business users, or if you also intend to make a system for the everyday users as originally planned. Do regular users take a backseat now? or are both being kept in focus? This is not a a complaint, but rather, it would just be nice to know rather than keeping it a secret. I do not believe you intend to make it a secret, but it can come across as such, that's why I request a statement on the matter. -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "qubes-users" group. To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to qubes-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com. To post to this group, send email to qubes-users@googlegroups.com. To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/qubes-users/59c48c3b-a634-42cd-a484-366e4af9efc2%40googlegroups.com. For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.
