On Sun, Sep 23, 2018 at 01:41:25PM -0400, Neil Van Dyke wrote:
> * The `let`-ish forms add terse support for frequent multiple-value LHS
> (without burdening single-value LHS, nor increasing rightward drift).

The notation I've found useful against rightward drift in a Lispish 
language is this:

Instead of writing s-expressions like (a b c (d e f ( g h i)))
where the letters stand for arbitrary s-expressions
 wrote them as (a b c / d e f /g h i), or in multilint format
    (a c b
       ( d e f 
           ( g h i

I could write
    ( a b c
    / d e f
    / g h i

Of course, in Racket you'd have to find another symbol than / because
it's already taken

Aking advantage of this, I also had a nonrecursive let:

    ( let a b
    / let c d
    / let e f
    / g a c e

-- hendrik

You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Racket Users" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to racket-users+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com.
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to