Hi Josh,

Thanks so very much for your time in responding to my questions.  This has
been very helpful information and I find it quite encouraging.  Thank you
for your offer for a continued conversation as well.

Yours,

Peter

> From: Josh French <[email protected]>
> Reply-To: <[email protected]>
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 10:51:52 -0500
> To: <[email protected]>
> Subject: Re: [Radiant] Stories of stability
> 
> Hi Peter,
> 
>> What do folks consider a "high-volume" site?  If I'm looking to
>> handle 3 - 5
>> million page views monthly, which I can do with a few production Rails
>> servers and a non-trivial production architecture (memcache, n-tier
>> architecture, etc.), do folks think Radiant will be up to the task?
> 
> We're using Radiant on a number of mid- to high-traffic sites. I don't
> have current numbers in front of me, but at last count our two largest
> clients had half a million unique visitors so let's assume a
> significant number of pageviews.
> 
> All of our apps to date are given one dedicated app server and when
> called for, a separate DB server (one is backed by an Oracle cluster.)
> The built-in caching mechanism is adequate for all but the largest of
> those. Horizontal scaling has been achievable so far without much
> forethought at the application level.
> 
>> Have you
>> used other CMS?s?  Where did they fall short, or where did they have
>> features that you miss?
> 
> We've used the whole gamut. End users like Radiant because, as they
> tell us, the admin UI is more user-friendly and the core concepts more
> grokkable than the alternatives. From a developer perspective, Radiant
> is great because the core is built to be extensible. There's almost an
> a la carte approach to building out a CMS in Radiant, and when someone
> asks for a feature that doesn't exist yet, integration doesn't require
> armed combat with the framework.
> 
> To be fair, some of the other platforms out there may be a better fit
> for portal or community sites. We've done a few Radiant sites that
> integrate the notion of user accounts, and in every case we've had to
> make concessions that affect performance. Just a fair warning, if
> that's your scenario.
> 
> Hope this is helpful. If you want to talk specifics, feel free to
> email me.
> 
> Josh
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post:   [email protected]
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   [email protected]
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to