Compete.com tells me that ruby-lang gets about 1/10 the traffic I currently
get.  So your musing about the production configuration is at the heart of
the question.

- Peter

> From: Mohit Sindhwani <t...@onghu.com>
> Organization: Viometrix | Onghu
> Reply-To: <t...@onghu.com>, <radiant@radiantcms.org>
> Date: Thu, 24 Dec 2009 21:47:26 +0800
> To: <radiant@radiantcms.org>
> Subject: Re: [Radiant] Stories of stability
> 
> Peter Degen-Portnoy wrote:
>> Thanks, Steven, for the added perspective.
>> 
>> What do folks consider a "high-volume" site?  If I'm looking to handle 3 - 5
>> million page views monthly, which I can do with a few production Rails
>> servers and a non-trivial production architecture (memcache, n-tier
>> architecture, etc.), do folks think Radiant will be up to the task?
>>   
> Well, the ruby-lang site runs on Radiant.. wonder what configuration it
> uses.
> 
> That said, if your content doesn't change too rapidly, you can increase
> the cache timeout to a good large number.. my sites are not high volume
> - more like niche technology sites, so I wouldn't know for sure.
> 
> Cheers,
> Mohit.
> 12/24/2009 | 9:47 PM.
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Radiant mailing list
> Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
> Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
> Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

_______________________________________________
Radiant mailing list
Post:   Radiant@radiantcms.org
Search: http://radiantcms.org/mailing-list/search/
Site:   http://lists.radiantcms.org/mailman/listinfo/radiant

Reply via email to